Feature check

Confirm whether a single feature is disclosed.

Does this patent disclose [Feature X]?

Provide a Yes/No answer and if disclosed, cite where in the patent the feature is disclosed. 

Multi-feature filter

Check several features in one pass.

Does this patent disclose ALL of the following:

1) Feature A

2) Feature B

3) Feature C

Answer Yes or No, indicate which features are missing, and if disclosed, cite where in the patent the feature is disclosed.

Direct feature matching

Assess whether key invention features are disclosed in a reference.

Compare the following invention description to this patent:

[PASTE INVENTION DESCRIPTION]

Identify the key features in the invention and indicate whether each feature is:

- Explicitly disclosed

- Partially disclosed

- Not disclosed

Return as a table with supporting passages, citing directly from the patent and from the invention description.

Element-by-element mapping

Break an invention into discrete components and check coverage.

Parse the following invention description into discrete elements:

[PASTE INVENTION DESCRIPTION]

For each element, indicate whether it is present in this patent and where it is disclosed.

Return as a structured table.

Differences extraction

Identify what is missing from a reference.

Compare this patent to the following invention:

[PASTE INVENTION DESCRIPTION]

Identify the key differences between the invention and this patent.

Focus only on features that are missing or materially different.

Return as bullet points.

Obviousness (combination analysis)

Identify which elements could be combined with other references.

Based on the following invention:

[PASTE INVENTION DESCRIPTION]

Identify which features are disclosed in this patent and which are missing, such that they could potentially be combined with another reference to render this invention obvious.

Return as a table.

Quick patentability filter

Rapidly eliminate non-relevant references.

Identify the key features of the invention from below text:

[PASTE INVENTION DESCRIPTION]].

Does this patent disclose all of the key features?

Answer Yes or No, indicate which features are missing, and if disclosed, cite where in the patent the feature is disclosed. 

Element-by-Element Claim Mapping

Map prior art to claim elements

Using claims X, Y, and Z of [PASTE PATENT NUMBER], map each claim element against this patent.

For each element, indicate:

- Present / Partially Present / Not Present

- Where it is disclosed in this patent (with citation)

Return as a structured table.

Advanced: Full Claim Mapping + Scoring

Detailed invalidity analysis with structured scoring

You are a senior patent litigator representing a technology company accused of patent infringement. Evaluate whether a prior art reference discloses each limitation of Claim X of [PASTE PATENT NUMBER]. Advance only technically and legally credible positions.

Instructions:

Apply the broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) of the claim language.

Do not rely on or quote the asserted patent for disclosure. All citations must come from the prior art reference.

Do not speculate. If support is weak or missing, identify the gap clearly.

Avoid strained or frivolous arguments—assess disclosure as a reasonable patent litigator would.

Output Format:

Provide a table with the following columns:

(A) Limitation

(B) Disclosure Status: Disclosed / Arguably Disclosed / Partially Disclosed / Not Disclosed

(C) Analysis: Concisely explain how the prior art maps to the limitation. Identify what is disclosed and what is missing. Include specific supporting excerpts from the prior art with precise citations (e.g., column, line, paragraph, figure).

Post-Table Assessment:

In 2–3 sentences, evaluate:

The overall strength of the reference against Claim X; and

Whether the reference is stronger standing alone or in combination with another reference.

Claim X Limitations:

[Copy and Past limitations of claim X]

Claim Coverage Check

Assess whether a product/process is covered by a patent

Generate a claim chart comparing the claims of this patent to the below product/process description.

[PASTE PRODUCT DESCRIPTION]

For each claim, identify the essential elements and indicate whether they are:

- Present

- Partially Present

- Not Present in the product/process description provided.

Cite where each essential element is claimed in this patent and where it is described in the product/process description.

Return the results as a table.

Based on the above, would a product of the above product/process description infringe this patent? 

Binary Risk Filter

Quickly assess potential FTO risk

Does a product or process of the below description read on the claims of this patent:

[PASTE PRODUCT OR INVENTION DESCRIPTION]

Answer Yes or No, followed by a short reasoning citing specific claims.

Risk Level Assessment

Summarize risk level in a crude format

Based on the claims of this patent only, assess whether there is a risk that a product/process of the below description would infringe this patent.

[PASTE PRODUCT OR INVENTION DESCRIPTION]

Answer:  High, medium,low and Provide 2–3 reasons based on specific claim elements.

Claim vs Cited Patent 

Compare elements of your claim relative to the patent cited against you

Compare the below claim to this patent:

[PASTE CLAIM LANGUAGE]

Parse the claim into distinct claim elements and for each claim element, indicate whether it is:

- Disclosed

- Partially Disclosed

- Not Disclosed

If disclosed, cite specific passages from this patent where the element is disclosed.

Return as a structured table.

Examiner Rejection Validation

To get a second opinion on an examiner’s rejection 

Based on the following Office Action rejection:

[PASTE EXAMINER’S REASONING]

Identify:

- The features from the claimed text the Examiner alleges are disclosed in this patent

- Whether those features are actually disclosed

- Any features that are not clearly supported

Return as a table with citations. 

Distinguishing Argument Builder

Useful if you believe that the piece of prior art that is cited is significantly different

Compare this patent to the below claim:

[YOUR PATENT APPLICATION # OR PASTE CLAIM OR NATURAL LANGUAGE DESCRIPTION]

Does this patent disclose each element of this claim?

List any similarities and differences between the above claim and the disclosure of the patent.

Provide an argument as to what in the above claim text is not disclosed in the patent.